Gitlab merge request workflow

If you find an issue, please submit a merge request with a fix or improvement, ifyou can, and include tests. If you don’t know how to fix the issue but can write a testthat exposes the issue, we will accept that as well. In general, bug fixes thatinclude a regression test are merged quickly, while new features without propertests might be slower to receive feedback.

The workflow to make a mergerequest is as follows: 1. Fork the project intoyour personal namespace (or group) on GitLab. See full list on docs. To make sure that your merge request can be approve please ensure that it meetsthe contribution acceptance criteria below: 1. The change is as small as possible.

Include proper tests and make all tests pass (unless it contains a testexposing a bug in existing code). Every new class should have correspondingunit tests, even if the class is exercised at a higher level, such as a feature test. If a failing CI build seems to be unrelated to your contribution, you can tryrestarting the fai. If you contribute to GitLab please know that changes involve more than justcode.

We use the following definition of done. Clear description explaining the relevancy of the contribution. Working and clean code that is commented where needed. Unit, integration, and system tests that all passon the CI server. If you add a dependency in GitLab (such as an operating system package) pleaseconsider updating the following, and note the applicability of each in your mergerequest: 1. Note the addition in the release blog post(create one if it doesn’t exist yet).

The GitLab Installation Guide. The CI environment preparation. The Omnibus package creator. Consider you’re a software developer working in a tea1.

You checkout a new branch, and submit your changes through a merge request 2. You gather feedback from your team 3. You work on the implementation optimizing code with Code Quality reports 4. You avoid using dependencies whose license is not compatible with your project with License Compliance reports 6. You request the approvalfrom your manager 7. Pushes a commit with their final review 7. Approves the merge request 7. Sets it to merge when pipeline succeeds 8. Your implementations were successfully shipped to your customer B. Merge requests (aka “MRs”) display a great deal of information about the changes proposed. Your changes are previewed with R. MRs also contain navigation tabs from which you can see the discussion happening on the threathe list of commits, the list of pipelines and jobs, the code changes, and inline code reviews. To get starte read the introduction to merge requests.

So far, the navigation tabs present in merge requests to display Discussion,Commits, Pipelines, and Changeswere located after the merge requestwidget. To facilitate this navigation without having to scroll up and down through the pageto find these tabs, based on user feedback, we’re experimenting with a new positioningof these tabs. They are now located at the top of the merge request, with a newOverview tab, containing the description of the merge request followed by thewidget.

Next to Overview, you can find Pipelines, Commits, and Changes. Please note this change is currently behind a feature flag which is enabled by default. There are two main ways to have a merge request flow with GitLab : 1. Working with protected branchesin a single repository 2. When the merge request is ready to be handed back for changes or further review, ensure that the individual responsible for the next step is assigned and signal the handoff with.

In this article, we focus on how to improve the workflow with code reviews via GitLab merge requests. We also talk about code review best practices we follow at Yalantis. Where do I submit a merge request? Can I merge with GitLab?

What is GitLab workflow? How do I delete a Git merge request? By using pipelines for merge requests, GitLab exposes additional predefined variables to the pipeline jobs. Those variables contain information of the associated merge request , so that it’s useful to integrate your job with GitLab Merge Request API.

You can find the list of available variables in the reference sheet. I’ve not tested gitlab either. I do not want to manage the merge request. I want to approve the merge request.

GitLab is letting me approve the merge request —that is not the problem! Notifications—not managing, not merging, not protecting branches. If I am assigned as an approver of a merge. In this case, the review process is not only slowed down by back and forth, but also contains the discussions which are useful for one section, but not for another.

Merge requests workflow We welcome merge requests from everyone, with fixes and improvements to GitLab code, tests, and documentation. The issues that are specifically suitable for community contributions are listed with the Accepting merge requests label, but you are free to contribute to any issue you want. The issue is that since these merge option require fast-forwar if multiple merge request are created for the same target branch.

If you open the merge request but do not assign it to anyone, it is a Work In Progress merge request. A merge request is an online place to discuss the change and review the code. These are used to discuss the proposed implementation but are not ready for inclusion in the master branch yet. You can always close the merge request without merging the branches.

However, the standard workflow is that, if you find some issues with the code, you can comment the specific lines of code if you go to Changes or comment the whole merge request and suggest possible improvements. Then the developer can resolve those code issues you found. A new branch will be created in your fork and a new merge request will be started.